Hill v. Amentum Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 JONATHON HILL, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01750-MMD-BNW 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 8 AMENTUM SERVICES, INC., 9 Defendant. 10 11 I. SUMMARY 12 Plaintiffs Jonathon Hill and Phillip Rowton sued their employer, Defendant Amentum 13 Services, Inc., for allegedly violating the Uniformed Services Employment and 14 Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. § 4301, et seq. (“USERRA”) by not paying 15 them for 90 days of active duty military leave pay when they were called up from the 16 reserves and served active military duty. (ECF No. 1.)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Joe Grady MurrahCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Kevin Ziober v. Blb Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Oliver Marshall v. Western Grain Company, Inc., and the Riverside Group, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Gerard Travers v. Federal Express CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.