Marie and Alex Manoogian Fund v. United States (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
In this renegotiation proceeding the appeals raise the validity of summary judgments entered by the District Court for excess profits. The question in each appeal is the same.
To resolve the issue, it must be known whether the Commissioner of Internal Revenue or the Tax Court is the administrative agency to determine whether the appellant is a charitable organization, absolved from renegotiation for excess profits.
The Renegotiation Act empowers the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board to determine and authorize the institution of action for excess profits, provides for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- U. S. Electrical Motors, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Chairman of United States Maritime Commission v. California Eastern Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sandnes' Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Ebco Manufacturing Co. v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Marie and Alex Manoogian Fund, D/B/A Metal Parts Manufacturing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Metallurgical, Inc. v. The Renegotiation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- The Ebco Manufacturing Company v. Secretary Of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.