Legal Opinion · Dissent

Randolph v. Prowers

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1912No. 3370Published

Appeal from Bent District Court. Hon. Henry Hunter, Judge.

1DissentKing, J.

I am unable' to concur with the views expressed by the majority of the members of this court in their opinion herein, or with their conclusions, which seem to me to sacrifice justice to a technicality, and in which a strict construction of, and compliance with the terms of the statute are needlessly enforced, to the end that a fraud is permitted and perpetuated which may and should be avoided by the proper ap*556plication of the principles of equity, which appear to have been recognized and applied by the trial court.

I accept the statement made in the opinion of the court that the controlling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boerum v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Young v. WittenmyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. New York Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Axton v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Grady v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API