Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Muldowney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1985No. 84-2303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

470 So.2d 766 (1985)

Nathan B. HIRSCH, M.D., Appellant,

v.

Young H. MULDOWNEY, Appellee.

No. 84-2303.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 4, 1985.

Thornton & Herndon and John Edward, Miami, for appellant.

John Muldowney, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

2Per curiam

The trial court should have granted defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution where (1) the last record activity prior to the filing of that motion was an order continuing trial filed more than one year before, and (2) plaintiff did not show good cause in writing, at least five…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Govayra v. StraubelSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Bogart v. FB Condominiums, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heinz v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. SOUTHWINDS RIDING ACD. v. SchneiderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. MIAMI NAT. BANK v. GreenfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Golden Triad Carriers, Inc. v. Paco American Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API