Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. Bowen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1902No. 1085PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District has certified to this court the following statement and question:

“This appeal, now pending before us, is from a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee for $7250 recovered as damages for personal injuries, received while in the service of appellant as a freight brakeman.
“One ground of recovery alleged, and relied on in the trial of the case was what is familiarly termed discovered negligence, that is, that the conductor of the train discovered that appellee was in a dangerous position in time to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cockrill v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Texas Electric Ry. Co. v. WootenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API