Legal Opinion
DeVizio v. Hobart Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on September 4, 1987, which, inter alia, denied the cross motion by defendant-appellant Nestmark Realty Corporation for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 or, in the alternative, pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing the complaint, is unanimously reversed on the law to the extent appealed from and defendant-appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment *509pursuant to CPLR 3212 granted, without costs or disbursements.
This action involves a claim for damages arising out of personal injuries allegedly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Putnam v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Silver v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Fischer v. Battery Building Maintenance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vushaj v. Insignia Residential Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Andrews v. PorrecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hernandez v. Neubert Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Martin v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011