Legal Opinion

Ripley v. Eady & Mayfield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1899PublishedCited by 30 opinions

' Complaint. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. February 16, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

1. The bill of exceptions in the present case alleges error in sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s peti*423tion. The action was brought by Ripley, as receiver of the State Savings Bank. He alleged that Eady & Mayfield, a partnership, had made and delivered. to the bank a bond in the sum of $1,000, the condition of which was that if Eady & May-field failed and refused, on demand, to purchase from the bank certain shares of stock in a land company at the stipulated price of $1,000, then the makers of the bond were to be liable thereon. The petition alleged that the receiver had duly made upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Dart v. Southwestern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Tinsley v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Manley v. Exposition Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Wells v. Butler's Builders' Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Higgins v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API