Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wacondo v. Concha

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1994No. 14200PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLACK, Judge.

Defendant Concha is a member of the Taos Pueblo. Plaintiff Salas is a member of the Zia Pueblo who resides in Rio Rancho. Plaintiff Wacondo is a member and resident of the Jemez Pueblo. Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of a shooting committed within the exterior boundaries of the Jemez Pueblo. As a result of the shooting, Defendant was convicted in federal court of voluntary manslaughter and assault.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint for personal injuries seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the wrongful death and injuries they suffered as a result of Defendant’s aetions.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Duro v. ReinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roe v. DoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Louis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
  3. Garcia v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians v. BoyceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API