Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Croswell

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1809Published

1Per curiam

In the cases of Spencer v. Sampson, and Foot v. Croswell, (1 Caines, 489.) Livingston v. Cheetham, (1 Johns. Rep. 61.) and Van Vechten v. Hopkins, (2 Johns. Rep. 373.) the rule was settled, that unless it appears, that the plaintiff was libelled for his official conduct, in some important public trust, we will not grant a special jury; In the present case, though the plaintiff was at the time, a representative in congress, and major-general of the militia of the state, yet it does not appear that he was libelled for any conduct in either of those official characters.

The motion must,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowne v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1803

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API