Legal Opinion

Turk v. Hysan Products Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 1963No. 62-243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellants were the plaintiffs below in a suit against the appellee. It was alleged in their complaint that the defendant, a manufacturer of chemical products, orally granted the plaintiffs an exclusive agency to sell, market and promote the sale of a new chemical product identified as “Futron” in the Dade and Broward County area; that the plaintiffs performed their end of the bargain but the defendant violated the terms of the oral agreement by refusing to continue to furnish “Futron” to the plaintiffs in Miami, Florida.

The relief sought in the complaint was an injunction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Road Dept. v. Newhall Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Robinson v. SaxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Chaney v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. FLORIDA-GEORGIA CHEM. CO v. National Laboratories, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Murry v. Zynyx Marketing Communications Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. SeaEscape, Ltd. v. Maximum Mktg. Exposure, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Kies v. HollubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. All Seasons Condo Assoc. v. Patrician HotelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API