Legal Opinion

State v. Blackhoop

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 22, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 11721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

We must decide whether a procedure utilized by the trial judge to select alternate jurors, which resulted in the only two members of the jury who were of the same race as the defendant being named alternates, was improper.

The defendant, Brian Blackhoop, a native American, was charged by information with sexual assault, a class 2 felony, and criminal trespass, a class 6 felony. The defendant’s jury trial resulted in him being found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to the presumptive terms of seven years imprisonment on the sexual assault conviction and one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. LatigueArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. State v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. State v. RuelasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. SabalosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. State v. BlackhoopArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RuelasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API