Legal Opinion

(PC) Carroll v. Sean Diddy Combs

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 1, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00080Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:25-cv-0080 JLT EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES, 14 SEAN DIDDY COMBS, TERMINATING PENDING MATTERS AS MOOT, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF 15 Defendants. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 16 17 Tremaine Carroll initiated this action by filing a complaint asserting violations of her 18 constitutional rights, and later requested to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 7.) Because 19…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API