Legal Opinion

Klein v. Dooley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1997No. 96-1285PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

A defendant in a suit under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act may recover costs and attorney’s fees if the trial court finds that the plaintiffs DTPA claims were groundless or made in bad faith or for purposes of harassment. Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 17.50(e). A plaintiffs voluntary nonsuit does not affect a defendant’s pending counterclaim for costs and attorney’s fees. Tex.R. Civ. P. 162. Today we consider: When DTPA plaintiffs take a voluntary non-suit and the trial court later rules that the defendants are not entitled to costs and fees under section 17.50(c), does the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott & White Memorial Hospital v. SchexniderTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Felderhoff v. KnaufTexas Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Epps v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Villafani v. TrejoTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Crites v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. ctl/thompson Texas, Llc v. Starwood Homeowner's Association, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Ortiz v. Collins, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API