Legal Opinion
State v. Durant
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 6, 2007No. SC 17652PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Jerry Durant, appeals, following our granting of his petition for certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and reinstating the six year unexecuted portion of his previous conviction. See State v. Durant, 94 Conn. App. 219, 233, 892 A.2d 302 (2006). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly found that he had violated his probation based solely on his arrest for charges of which he had been acquitted.
The following facts and procedural history are set forth in the Appellate…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- News America Marketing In-Store, Inc. v. MarquisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
4Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. BlakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. LanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. BouteillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. SlighConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.