Legal Opinion
State Bank v. Camic
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 13, 1983No. 82-2781PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The State Bank of St. Charles (Bank), suing on behalf of the estate of Christopher Á. Ward (Ward), deceased, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Aurora, Illinois, and individually named Aurora police officers. The principal issue on appeal is whether questions of material fact exist relevant to the Bank’s claims that the defendants violated Ward’s constitutional rights by prohibiting him from making a phone call prior to their placing him into a cell and/or failihg adequately to supervise Ward so as to prevent his committing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Junior Ray Duckworth, Cross-Appellants v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Edward James Matzker, Jr. v. Raymond Herr, Sheriff, Richard A. Schaab, Lt. And Mary Pearsall, Corrections OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Jackson v. City of JolietCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Thomas Patrick Walsh v. Nicholas Mellas and Harry MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- State Bank Of St. Charles v. CamicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.