Bergen v. Morton Amusement Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Motion for a new trial after a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants Morton Amusement Company, Inc., and Thomas S. Sartorelli.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict against the amusement - company and the defendant Sartorelli, and these defendants now move for a new trial.
The action was to recover for personal injuries received under the following circumstances: The amusement company was the owner of a lot fronting on Connecticut street in the city of Buffalo. It proposed the erection of a theatre huilding on this property. Its president, who was an architect, prepared plans and specifications for its erection. The defendant Sartorelli made a written contract with the amuse*649ment company to do the excavation and mason work…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Sullivan v. . DunhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dorrity v. . RappNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Deming v. . Terminal Railway of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Berg v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDaniel Bros. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931