Legal Opinion

Rivas v. Oppenborn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 1992No. 92-80PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

605 So.2d 516 (1992)

Luis C. RIVAS, Petitioner,

v.

Honorable Henry L. OPPENBORN, Jr., Respondent.

No. 92-80.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 8, 1992.

Miguel A. Suarez, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

In our view, defense counsel did nothing more than silently fail to object to the setting of the trial date beyond the speedy trial time.[1] It is, however, the law that

[m]ere silence of the defendant or defense counsel at…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. AnsleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. JB v. KordaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Blackstock v. NewmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. State v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Ryan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. State v. EubanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API