Cross v. Balkcom
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
The facts are not in dispute, and the sole issue here involved is the correctness of the judgment of the superior court affirming the determination of the review committee that the 1958 changes in the allotment regulations were applicable to the reconstitution proceedings. A rule or regulation adopted by administrative officials under authority of and within the scope of legislative enactment, which is an effective means of enforcing and administering the law, has the force and effect of law. Atkins v. Manning, 206 Ga. 219, 221 (56 S. E. 2d 260). See also, Georgia Pub.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maner v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Atkins v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Rivers v. Dixie Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Murphey v. MurpheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Georgia Public Service Commission v. Jones Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Balkcom v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Holstein v. North Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Schwartz v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- American Medical International, Inc. v. Charter Lake Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Cross v. BalkcomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.