BUFALINO
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
- Interim Decision #1517 ' or BI7EALINO • MATTER In Deportation Proceedings A-10607337 Deoided by Board September 30, .1965 (11 Where the special inquiry officer states unequivocally and without hesita- tion that he did not prejudge the cause; that he received no advice, instruc- tions, or directions whatsoever in the cause; and that all his determinations were premised solely on his honest and sincere evaluation of the evidence ad- duced and his understanding and knowledge of the applicable laws and •regulations, his unequivocal statement of lack of prejudgment or prejudice effectively meets…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Chaunt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. AccardoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- Chris Dunat v. L. W. Hurney, District Director of Immigration, PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Louie King Fong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mirzoyan v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- JIMENEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- MENDOZA-SANDINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
- GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1993
- WONGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.