Legal Opinion

BUFALINO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1965No. 1517PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

- Interim Decision #1517 ' or BI7EALINO • MATTER In Deportation Proceedings A-10607337 Deoided by Board September 30, .1965 (11 Where the special inquiry officer states unequivocally and without hesita- tion that he did not prejudge the cause; that he received no advice, instruc- tions, or directions whatsoever in the cause; and that all his determinations were premised solely on his honest and sincere evaluation of the evidence ad- duced and his understanding and knowledge of the applicable laws and •regulations, his unequivocal statement of lack of prejudgment or prejudice effectively meets…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Chaunt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. AccardoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
  4. Chris Dunat v. L. W. Hurney, District Director of Immigration, PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. Louie King Fong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mirzoyan v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. JIMENEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  3. MENDOZA-SANDINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
  4. GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1993
  5. WONGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API