Legal Opinion

Conner v. Paxson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1822PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR to the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

The condition of the bond upon which this action was founded, is to the following effect: Whereas the president and trustees of New-Albany have obtained an injunction, prohibiting John Conner from the further use of a ferry, &c., and whereas the said trustees have instituted a suit at law to try Comer’s right to the ferry; now if the president and trustees, or the above bound Charles Paxson, shall indemnify and save harmless the said Conner from all damages in consequence of said injunction, in case the right to the ferry shall be established in Conner, then the obligation to be void,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. State v. . Cross and WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Dupuis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
  4. Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Center TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. LaPlante v. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API