Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Middleton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 2010No. 1D09-48Published

1ConcurrenceThomas, J.

I concur in the majority opinion, but write to explain that while we cannot determine whether Appellant will again be tried for first-degree murder, the possibility is not foreclosed by the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. If Appellant is tried for first-degree murder, he will have the right to demand a 12-person jury. Thus, contrary to the State’s argument, Appellant has demonstrated prejudice by counsel’s failure to obtain a mistrial after a juror was removed for misconduct.

*363As explained in the majority opinion, although Appellant was indicted for first-degree murder, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API