Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Pitney

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 2, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This action is brought under “An act concerning legacies” (3 Comp. Slat., p. 3087), by Margaret Kelly, to recover a legacy bequeathed to her in and by the sixth paragraph of the will of Marcus L. Ward, deceased, reading as follows:

“Sixths — I give and bequeath to my faithful servants, Samuel Billings. Margaret Kelly and Lizzie Birne, of said city of Newark, who have been in my employ for many years, the sum of five thousand ($5,000) dollars each, provided they are living, and in my employ at the time of my death, such gifts to be paid free…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Commonwealth v. TrefethenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ringwood Assocs. Ltd. v. Jack's of Route 23, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Laterra v. LaterraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  4. Andricsak v. National Fireproofing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API