Legal Opinion
United States v. Elmore Roy Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 11, 2003No. 02-13168PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYSKAMP, District Judge:
Appellant-defendant Elmore Roy Anderson (“Anderson”) appeals his convictions for various violations of federal law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm but remand for further sentencing by the district court.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A. Procedural Background
On July 25, 2001, a grand jury indicted Anderson and two corporate defendants, Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc. (“BHIC”) and Bilhar International Establishment f/k/a Harbert International Establishment (“Bilhar”), for conspiracy to violate § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (Count One) and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- David Keller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Serge EdouardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BelfastCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States ex rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.