Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1956No. Civ. A. 11022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, District Judge.

The fatal accident of which this litigation is concerned occurred on January 9, 1952 at the same crossing described in the case of Dostal v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 3 Cir., 189 F.2d 352. There are some differences, however, in the character of the crossing which will be mentioned.

The accident with which we are concerned happened between 6:30 and 6:45 A.M. The roadway was wet, but there was no storm either of snow or rain. Visibility was variously described, but the evidence shows that it was cloudy.

There was one eye-witness to the accident. It was on the testimony of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Ealy v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Bickel v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Dostal v. Baltimore & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  5. Haverstick v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. James Oliver Conrad and Suzanne Conrad Godot, Executors of the Estate of William O. Conrad, Deceased v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API