Walker v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
G. Daniel Walker appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his second amended complaint alleging Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and civil rights claims against prison officials and state agencies in California and Illinois. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals for failure to state a claim under the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
The district court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walker v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003