Legal Opinion

Helgeson v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided March 6, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 2243PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMolkenbuhr, J.

In this case, plaintiffs were involved in an accident with one Donald Aker, who was insured by the defendant carrier. Thereafter plaintiffs employed an attorney to represent them. Subsequently an agent of the defendant called upon plaintiffs with reference to their claim, but was told to see their attorney who had been employed to represent them in the impending litigation and who was authorized to enter into negotiations for a settlement of their claims. Thereafter an offer of settlement in the sum of $1,250 was made to settle both claims to the attorney by the defendant ; said settlement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crahe v. Mercantile Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Central Trust Co. v. Hahn-Jacobsen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Rosacker v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Berlowitz v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Jennings v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Helgeson v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API