Legal Opinion

Letzkus v. Nothwang

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Jacob Frederick Nothwang died testate, and by his will devised his entire estate, real and personal, to his two sons, David Henry and Frederick. The testator was a widower at the time of his death, and the two sons named were his sole heirs-at-law.

By paragraph 1 of the will certain lots in North Little Rock were given to David Henry, together with certain personal property, and by paragraph 2 certain other lots in North Little Rock were given to Frederick, together with certain personal property. There is nothing •in either paragraph restricting the estate devised, and, construed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booe v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Bernstein v. BrambleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Davis v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Little Rock v. LenonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. First National Bank of Ft. Smith v. MarreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. McBride v. ConyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Harry H. Smedley v. City of Waldron, Thomas Sawyer, Mayor, Waldron, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API