Legal Opinion
Menorah Home & Hospital v. Local 144
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 3, 1983No. 83 CIV 2479PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Petitioners, Menorah Home and Hospital for the Aged and Infirm, Inc. (the “Home”) and Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. (“M.N. H.”), bring this action under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. They seek to permanently stay an arbitration proceeding. Respondent, Local 144, Hotel, Hospital, Nursing Home & Allied Health Services Union, AFL-CIO (“Local 144” or the “Union”), has filed a cross-motion to compel arbitration under 9 U.S.C. § 4. While petitioners’ motion for a stay…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Thomas C. Gangemi, as President of the Syracuse Draftsmen's Association, and General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Rochdale Village, Inc. v. Public Service Employees Union, Local No. 80, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Public Service Employees Union, Local No. 80, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Rochdale Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- Menorah Home & Hospital v. Local 144Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984