Legal Opinion

Milton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 21, 1994No. 94-00107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINCE, Judge.

Christopher Milton challenges the amount of restitution ordered after his conviction for grand theft. We reverse because .the state did not demonstrate the total amount of the restitution was directly or indirectly attributable to the crime for which appellant was convicted.

Milton was charged by information with grand theft of nail guns. Both the defense attorney and the prosecutor indicated Milton was caught with three nail guns. These guns were allegedly taken during a burglary of the San Antonio Lumber Company. Milton denied any participation in the burglary, and he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. O'CONNER v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Martel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. M.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. MP v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API