Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1961No. 30597PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

The respondent had resided with her husband in an apartment they rented from the appellants in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, for about four months prior to the occasion in evidence. The apartment had accommodations for three famines; the respondent and her husband lived upstairs, as did Mr. and Mrs. Dunn. The appellants, who owned the apartment, lived downstairs. The respondent and her husband had the privilege of using the basement for washing, and a machine with a wringer and two galvanized tubs on legs were furnished for this purpose by the appellants. Mr. and Mrs.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Lewis Ex Rel. Piening v. ZagataSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Layton v. PalmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. La Plant v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Phillips v. StockmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Hart v. City of ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Kettler v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API