Riddle Appeal
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
This case presents the question whether the double jeopardy clause of both the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions1 bars the retrial of one accused of neglect to support a bastard and fornication and bastardy under § 732 and § 506, respectively, of The Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872,2 when the initial trial was concluded by the court’s sua sponte declaration of a mistrial. The lower court concluded that double jeopardy barred further proceedings against the defendant on these charges. Although we agree that one who is criminally accused cannot be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. WidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DillworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McConnell v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Keller v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth ex rel. Dimpter v. KappSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.