Legal Opinion

Jos. S. Cohen & Sons Co., Inc. v. Hearst Magazines, Inc

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 30, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6064PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Examiner-in-Chief, representing the Commissioner of Patents, 97 USPQ 301, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences granting the petition of appellee, Hearst Magazines, Inc., owner of the mark, “Good Housekeeping,” for the cancellation of appellant’s notation, “Good Housekeeper,” as a trade-mark for women’s, misses’, and children’s dresses, frocks, pajamas, smocks, aprons, hostess coats, etc. The cancelled registration was issued September 27, 1938, under the Act of 1905 and republished February 22, 1949,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Independent Nail & Packing Co., Inc. v. Stronghold Screw Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Hanson v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Yoshida International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  2. Ultra-White Co. v. Johnson Chemical Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Omega S.A. v. Omega Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  4. Conde Nast Publications, Inc. v. Miss Quality, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart Schaffner & MarxDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API