Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Upper Scioto Drain. & Conserv. Dist.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1940No. 316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Hardin County, sustaining a demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff and dismissing the same, in an action pending therein wherein B. M. Hopkins was plaintiff and The Upper Scioto Drainage & .Conservancy District, a body corporate and political subdivision of the State of Ohio, having its office at Kenton, Ohio, was defendant.

The cause of action set forth in the petition is based on the alleged neglect and failure of the defendant, Upper Scioto Drainage & Conservancy District, to maintain…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummins v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Sharon Enterprises, Inc. v. Kenworth of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API