Legal Opinion
Celestine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1998No. 98-578PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
, |,YELVERTON, Judge.
This circuit has decided to address en banc the issue of whether a third party who is not an insured under an insurance contract has a cause of action for damages and penalties under La.R.S. 22:1220(B)(5). The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Johnathan Boudreaux and against Alise Celestine, individually and as natural tutrix on behalf of her minor children, Jasper and Coltlain Celestine. We affirm.
FACTION BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT
This suit arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Smith v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hernandez v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CAS. INS. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Armstrong v. RabitoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Guidroz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moxley v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999