Federal Deposit Insurance v. Rouse
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENT, District Judge.
ORDER AND REASONS
Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment was decided this date on memoranda. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
This action was brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Twin City Savings, F.S.A. (“F.D.I.C.” or “the Receiver”), in an effort to collect on continuing guarantees executed by defendants, Gary J. Rouse, Sandra T. Rouse, Alvin J. Faucheux, Jr., and Glen A. Slavich. Each defendant executed such a guarantee in favor of Twin City Savings Bank, F.S.B. As a result of these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Spencer v. CollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976