CALVIN FARRELL HADLEY v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
*50Dissenting Opinion
Hunter, J.
I must respectfully but vigorously dissent from the majority and concurring opinions for the reason that the majority of the Court fails to support with relevant authority its conclusion that the entry by police into the dwelling in question was constitutionally permissible.
The record, when viewed most favorably to the State, indicates that appellant and two others were charged with breaking into the Johnson Oil Company in Columbus, Indiana, early on the morning of June 19, 1966. Two witnesses who were parked in a Cummins Diesel Co. parking lot across the street…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.