Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Cook

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Creditor’s bill. In the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Decree pro confesso; error by defendant. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

On the 9th day of March, 1888, a bill in chancery was filed in the Superior Court, which alleged that on the 1st day of June, 1877, John A. Baldwin recovered in that court a judgment against John Crawford. “ That execution upon said judgment against the property of said defendant was thereafter duly issued and delivered to the sheriff of said county where said defendant at the time resided, and the same was thereafter by said sheriff returned wholly unsatisfied, he certifying thereon that he could find no property whereon to levy to make any part of the amount thereof. * * * That said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Durand & Co. v. Gray, Kingman & CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Winslow v. LelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. DeLeuw v. NeelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hall v. NeesIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Klein v. HorineIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curlett v. CurlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API