Legal Opinion

Fulda v. State, Office of Public Health

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1996No. 95 CW 1740PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

|2FOIL, Judge.

We granted supervisory writs in this case to review a decision of the Louisiana Commission on Ethics for Public Employees which held that a proposed contract with a state agency was prohibited by the Ethics Code. After a thorough review of the record, we vacate that ruling.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Charles Fulda, III, relator, sought the opinion of the Commission on Ethics for Public Employees (Commission) regarding the legality of a contract he was offered by the State of Louisiana, Office of Public Health (OPH) to run a research program. The factual background forming…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re BeychokSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. BD. OF COM'RS, FIFTH LA. LEVEE DIST. v. Commission on Ethics for Public EmployeesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. La. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. COM'N ON ETHICS FOR PUB. EMP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Bd. of Trustees, Employees'retirement v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Emp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. City of Baton Rouge v. ETHICS COM'N FOR PUB. EMP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. v. COM'N ON ETHICSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API