Legal Opinion
Wittman v. Personhuballah
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 23, 2016No. 14–1504PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
Ten Members of Congress from Virginia, intervenors in the District Court below, have appealed a judgment from a three-judge panel striking down a congressional redistricting plan applicable to the November 2016 election. We conclude that the intervenors now lack standing to pursue the appeal. And we consequently order the appeal dismissed.
I
This lawsuit began in October 2013, after the then-Governor of Virginia signed into law a new congressional redistricting *1735 plan (which we shall call the "Enacted Plan") designed to reflect the results of the 2010 census. Three voters from Congressional…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Safe Streets Alliance v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Stevens v. Zappos.com., Inc. (In re Zappos.com., Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Patrick Baehr v. Creig Northrop Team, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.