Katz 737 Corp. v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1ConcurrenceAndrias, J.
I agree that the complaint was properly dismissed. However, I write separately to express my view that the statutory scheme for luxury deregulation precludes plaintiffs common-law fraud cause of action.
Pursuant to Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of NY) §§ 26-504.1 and 26-504.3, a rent-stabilized apartment that has a legal regulated rent of at least $2,000 per month is eligible for luxury deregulation if the combined annual income of all persons occupying the unit as their primary residence exceeds $175,000 for each of the two years preceding the owner’s petition.* Rent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. v. MBIA Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kerusa Co. v. W10Z/515 Real Estate Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Berenger v. 261 West LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.