Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Katz 737 Corp. v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2012Published

1ConcurrenceAndrias, J.

I agree that the complaint was properly dismissed. However, I write separately to express my view that the statutory scheme for luxury deregulation precludes plaintiffs common-law fraud cause of action.

Pursuant to Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of NY) §§ 26-504.1 and 26-504.3, a rent-stabilized apartment that has a legal regulated rent of at least $2,000 per month is eligible for luxury deregulation if the combined annual income of all persons occupying the unit as their primary residence exceeds $175,000 for each of the two years preceding the owner’s petition.* Rent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. v. MBIA Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Kerusa Co. v. W10Z/515 Real Estate Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Berenger v. 261 West LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API