Opinion No. Oag 100-79, (1979)
Wisconsin Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM G. THIEL, Corporation Counsel Eau Claire County
You request my opinion whether, assuming the adoption of appropriate ordinances under the provisions of sec. 59.21 (8)(a), Stats., the county board may require the appointment of all deputy sheriffs to be under civil service and, further, may restrict the maximum number of all deputy sheriffs to be appointed, with the only exceptions in both contexts being appointments of "honorary deputies" and "posse comitatus/section59.24" deputies.
I am of the opinion that the county board may require the appointment of regularly employed deputies to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Kennedy v. BrunstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Maier v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Milwaukee County v. BuechWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Kagel v. BruggerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Telemark Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kocken v. Wisconsin Council 40Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Opinion No. Oag 5-86, (1986), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1986
- Kocken v. Wisconsin Council 40Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Opinion No. Oag 10-89, (1989), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1989