Legal Opinion

Senkinc v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1991No. 1240 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Andrew Senkinc (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the Referee’s decision denying him benefits pursuant to Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(b), for failing to prove that his voluntary termination of employment was for a necessitous and compelling reason.1

Claimant was employed by Professional Cabinetry Incorporated (Employer) for approximately thirty-seven years as a shop foreman. When Claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urista v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Matty v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Sorace v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Havrilchak v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. C. Texter v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. D.S. Fruchter v. Borough of MalvernCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API