Mace v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURANCE M. HYDE, Special Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of grand stealing, affirmed on appeal, State v. Mace, Mo.Sup., 429 S.W.2d 734. His motion to vacate his conviction, filed under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., was overruled in the trial court and appealed here.
The charge on which he was convicted was “that on October 1, 1965, [appellant] stole one ‘Sony’ brand tape recorder and *341one ‘Reed’ brand pipe cutter from Glenn and Wayne Barclay, d/b/a United Rent-All in Springfield, Missouri, by renting these articles from the Barclay’s and thereafter retaining them without their consent.” 429…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AchterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. SechrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. WroseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.