Legal Opinion

Dominguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1969No. 42459PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder without malice; the punishment, five years.

The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in this respect; that by accepting appellant’s confession as voluntarily made and admissible, it is contended that the State has not made its case because the confession stated that appellant shot at deceased’s legs while he was on the floor on his back. This Court properly answered this contention in Tapley v. State, 158 Tex. Cr.R. 495, 256 S.W.2d 583, 586, where we said:

“To say that even though the accused pointed a deadly weapon directly at the injured party…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Tapley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Trammell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Hemphill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Hartman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Redd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Kendrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API