Legal Opinion · Dissent

Exxon Corp. v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1984No. 68494Published

1DissentPope, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. While I agree with the majority that the “any evidence” rule applies to the findings made by a trial court in a bench trial, my review of the rec*148ord turns up no competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings of temporary mutual departure. Obviously, this is a case akin to David and Goliath. The majority opinion gives great weight to the fact that Exxon failed to notify Butler promptly of a stolen credit card. No matter how emotionally satisfying reliance on this aspect of the case may be, nonetheless, under the competent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Crawford v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Newby v. Bank of PinehurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Williams v. DosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API