Legal Opinion
Street v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1932No. 6675PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from an order o.f the District Court confirming the order of the referee in bankruptcy refusing to proceed summarily for lack of jurisdiction.
•On the 11th of June, 1929, the county of Alameda, state of California, acting by and through its board of supervisors, duly authorized, entered into a contract with J. F. Collins, the bankrupt, whereby said J. F. Collins agreed to do certain road work for the county of Alameda for a stipulated price and to give a bond for the faithful performance of such work. The bankrupt applied to the Pacific Indemnity…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In The Matter Of Land Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Wally Gray and Maryland Casualty Company, a Corporation, and Northern Commercial Company, a Corporation v. Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- In Re WorrallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Street v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- In Re Autocue Sales & Distributing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.