Legal Opinion

Sun Insurance Office, Limited v. Foil

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1938No. 14705PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The appellant brought action against the respondent to recover actual and punitive damages for the alleged willful, fraudulent and unlawful conversion of its automobile. The allegations of the complaint upon which the essential issue involved in this appeal turns, are as follows:

“4. That, on or about September 28, 1932, the automobile described above was located in the possession of the defendant ; that the defendant was advised that the title and ownership of the property was in the plaintiff, that said car was a stolen car, that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Castle v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Butler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Hall v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Brown, Osborne & Co. v. NewellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Globe Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. FoilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Allen v. RiedelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Cit. Bk. of Darlington v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Marvin v. ConnellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Royal-Liverpool Insurance Group v. McCarthySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API