Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Glisson v. Rooms To Go

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 1, 2004No. A04A0977Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRuffin, Presiding Judge

I agree with the majority that Glisson has established that she is disabled. Accordingly, she is entitled to temporary total disability (TTD) benefits and the State Board of Workers’ Compensation and superior court erred in concluding otherwise. Unlike the majority, however, I believe that the employer should be able to take credit for the salary Glisson was paid. Thus, I also dissent in part.

I do agree that the threshold issue is Glisson’s entitlement to workers’ compensation income benefits. Pursuant to OCGA §§ 34-9-261 and 34-9-262, an employee is entitled to payment of such benefits while…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ellison v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. State v. GraulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Caldwell v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Georgia Pacific Corp. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Dan Vaden Chevrolet v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API