Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Peden v. Valentine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1917No. 8894PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. E. L. ■ Roy, Judge. Quo warranto by the State of Texas, on relation of R. F. Peden, against I. T. Valentine. Judgment for respondent, and the relator appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, C. .J.

This is a quo warranto proceeding by the state to test the validity of I. T. Valentine’s claims to the office of judge of the county court of Tarrant county for civil cases. The information was filed by the county attorney upon the relation of Robert F. Peden, who also claims the office. Both Peden and Valentine claim under appointments of the Governor made to fill a vacancy as provided by the law creating the court. Valentine’s appointment was by Hon. Jas. E. Fterguson, then the regularly elected and acting Governor, during a recess of the Legislature, but this appointment,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of JeffersonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. BrinkerhoffTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Erwin v. BlanksTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Warren v. ShumanTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Keen v. FeatherstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. Glen Rose Independent School District Number OneTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Daves v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  3. State Ex Rel. Angelini v. HardbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. Gillette's EstateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Kugle v. Glen Rose Independent School Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API