Auto Acceptance Corp. v. Veneziano
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
The defendant has appealed from a deficiency judgment in favor of the plaintiff resulting from a resale of an automobile after its repossession by the plaintiff under a retail instalment contract. The defendant attacks two conclusions reached by the trial court but does not question any of the facts found by it. The finding reveals the following facts: On October 11, 1957, the defendant purchased an automobile under a retail instalment contract which was assigned to the plaintiff. After making some payments, he defaulted, and on October 14, 1958, the plaintiff repossessed the ear. On the same…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Treat v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Fisk Discount Corp. v. Brooklyn Taxicab Trans. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Interstate Ice & Power Corp. v. United States Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lunt v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.